Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 155125
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
Positives.......
Negatives......
Negatives......
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 155125
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
- pandagirl
- Subs Bench

- Posts: 537
- Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2024 1:42 pm
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
Positives
three goals scored
Negatives
pathetic defending
james all over the place
keeper couldnt save anything today
yeh, thanks leeds for ruining my night
There is greatness and then there is D C L ...
-
Prisoner37
- First Team

- Posts: 1153
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
+ Our first team would have beaten theirs tonight. Farke dropped the ball for the first time this season.
- Nobody nutted that wanabe Billy Bremner
- Having nightmares about both Trafford and DCL getting injured at the same time.
- Nobody nutted that wanabe Billy Bremner
- Having nightmares about both Trafford and DCL getting injured at the same time.
- Finnatic
- Superstar

- Posts: 6703
- Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2020 12:47 pm
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
P. Played well in the main and scored three away goals.
Steady debut by Bard (less said about the other debutant the better)
N. A bizarre thirty minutes when everything they touched turned to gold.
Still think the incredibly soft pen turned the game.
Gave Palmer the freedom to do what he wanted (no extra midfielder to combat this)
Farke should have reacted to the subs straight away after 2-0 up.
Steady debut by Bard (less said about the other debutant the better)
N. A bizarre thirty minutes when everything they touched turned to gold.
Still think the incredibly soft pen turned the game.
Gave Palmer the freedom to do what he wanted (no extra midfielder to combat this)
Farke should have reacted to the subs straight away after 2-0 up.
- malcolmw
- Manager

- Posts: 3707
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2023 4:20 am
- Location: Qualicum Beach, BC, Canada
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
I agree with that analysis. Its easy to do 'shoulda, coulda, woulda', but it was a bizarre game - so much so its hard to really take too much from it ... other thanFinnatic wrote: ↑Wed Sep 09, 2026 9:40 pm P. Played well in the main and scored three away goals.
Steady debut by Bard (less said about the other debutant the better)
N. A bizarre thirty minutes when everything they touched turned to gold.
Still think the incredibly soft pen turned the game.
Gave Palmer the freedom to do what he wanted (no extra midfielder to combat this)
Farke should have reacted to the subs straight away after 2-0 up.
- we have to learn to play a consistent 90 minutes of football. This is the 3rd game in a row we have a good half and then a bad half.
- new additions have really added value, but now Im worried about form of Stach and Longstaff.
- yet another game involving one of the uber rich teams where the play (and result?) turned on very poor referring.
- playing on the road for all but 1 so far is bloody ridiculous.
- BlackHillsPaul
- Site Contributor

- Posts: 4513
- Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2022 5:53 pm
- Location: Arizona, USA
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
Positive:
I thought Melvin Bard showed that he can help us once he is settled a bit. And having another competent LB is a big deal!!
Negative:
Farke's experimentation with turning Ampadu into a box to box midfielder. Can we call it a failure and get back to what works already? Goalkeeping and defense should be the strength of this team.
I thought Melvin Bard showed that he can help us once he is settled a bit. And having another competent LB is a big deal!!
Negative:
Farke's experimentation with turning Ampadu into a box to box midfielder. Can we call it a failure and get back to what works already? Goalkeeping and defense should be the strength of this team.
Football/Futbol/Soccer
- Musicman1965
- First Team

- Posts: 2139
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2021 3:11 pm
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
Positive - Good Intel for when we play them in Premier League.
Negative - Changes and formation to late.
Negative - Changes and formation to late.
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 155125
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
P Muharemovic once again.
N The first time I've been really cross with Daniel.
The writing was on the wall for all to see, I posted my thoughts up on the match thread at half-time, prior to the mayhem!
Alonso reacted, Farke just sat there cringing at a re-run of the replays on a monitor.
N The first time I've been really cross with Daniel.
The writing was on the wall for all to see, I posted my thoughts up on the match thread at half-time, prior to the mayhem!
Alonso reacted, Farke just sat there cringing at a re-run of the replays on a monitor.
- Orange Box
- Superstar

- Posts: 7493
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 3:51 pm
- Location: West of Scotland, formerly Cas Vegas
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
+ it was like watching a Bielsa team.
- it was like watching a Bielsa team.
- it was like watching a Bielsa team.
-
Johnsie123
- Subs Bench

- Posts: 656
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2019 9:15 pm
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
Positive-3 goals
Neg - Really poor keeper hopefully 1 off
As other have stated James is no def
Farke to slow with subs
We got to revert back to last season midfield/defence
Hopefully write it off and everyone learn from it inc Farke



Neg - Really poor keeper hopefully 1 off
As other have stated James is no def
Farke to slow with subs
We got to revert back to last season midfield/defence
Hopefully write it off and everyone learn from it inc Farke
- weasel
- Superstar

- Posts: 19690
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
- Location: Firmly on the Danny-Magnet
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Chelsea (EFL Cup)
If we make changes at half time then likely Aaronsen isn't on and we don't go 2-0 up. Far easier to make a raft of changes when you have players like Palmer on the bench and your team has been outplayed for the last 30 minutes of the first half. Chelsea needed to make a change because we'd taken control of the match during the first half after playing ourselves into the game early on.1964white wrote: ↑Thu Sep 10, 2026 8:59 am P Muharemovic once again.
N The first time I've been really cross with Daniel.
The writing was on the wall for all to see, I posted my thoughts up on the match thread at half-time, prior to the mayhem!
Alonso reacted, Farke just sat there cringing at a re-run of the replays on a monitor.
As it is the penalty turned the match. With our second goal, like Jon Newsome said, we'd silenced their crowd and taken the wind out of their sails after their changes. They get the ludicrous penalty, a lifeline, and a couple of minutes are level. A couple more minutes and we're behind. Farke then trying to bring subs on and as we are waiting for them to come on the 4th goes in.
I like the way we battled back after that. Showed good character. But to suggest we should have made changes at half time is just something a manager shouldn't do when they are controlling a match - note Farke made early changes against Brentford because of how poor we had been in that match.
Victor_Notts-17 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2026 7:03 pm Did you post them because there's something wrong with your brain