More like pushing for a European spot.
Spending big money, but on good players.

More like pushing for a European spot.






Top class player is Elliot, $116M is over the top (and probably makes Amps a 60M player) but MC are known to overpay... He was probably the only player who impressed me v Ghana..

Amps is £70m minimum now. He's homegrown and is 26 in September, so coming into peak years.The Subhuman wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2026 8:26 am Top class player is Elliot, $116M is over the top (and probably makes Amps a 60M player) but MC are known to overpay... He was probably the only player who impressed me v Ghana..

25-28 for me, peak years. Get them in at 22/23 not 29


Agreed, but you can still get another 2/3 good years of Amps after this season.

25 isn't he? He's just entering prime.


I completely agree, and it's making it harder for clubs like ours. £48m for a donkey like JSL for example and Championship players, who've never played in the PL, are now suddenly £30m players. Not to mention the wages. All it will do is bankrupt clubs.Barlow Boy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2026 9:51 pm Roy Keane rips into Manchester City after their £116m move for Elliot Anderson.
"£116 million for Elliot Anderson? Tell me football hasn't lost its mind. I'm not saying the lad isn't talented. He works hard, he's energetic, and he has plenty of potential.
But when a player with one standout top-flight season is suddenly worth more than some of the greatest midfielders we've seen over the last decade, something has gone seriously wrong.
Look at what has happened to the transfer market. Every window, Manchester City seem to find another reason to raise the price of everyone. £116 million for Elliot Anderson? Massive money for Marc Guéhi. Huge fees for Antoine Semenyo. More than £75 million for Joško Gvardiol. And people wonder why every club keep asking for ridiculous money
This isn't a dig at the players. If a club offers that kind of money, you'd be mad not to take the opportunity. But football has reached a stage where potential is being priced like a Ballon d'Or winner.
Players who are still proving themselves are carrying fees that used to be reserved for the very best in the world.
The problem is bigger than one transfer. When clubs with unlimited resources keep paying these numbers, everyone else follows. Average players become £50 million players, good players become £80 million players, and promising players suddenly cost over £100 million. The market loses all perspective.
Years ago, you paid those fees for footballers who had dominated Europe, won league titles, and delivered season after season. Now, one good campaign and the price tag explodes.
That's not football evolving;that's inflation running wild. If this is where the game is heading, don't be surprised when the first £250 million transfer arrives, because the market has completely lost touch with reality."


All well and good but the team he made his name at have done as much as anyone to inflate the transfer market by paying huge sums for very little previous record.Barlow Boy wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2026 9:51 pm Roy Keane rips into Manchester City after their £116m move for Elliot Anderson.
"£116 million for Elliot Anderson? Tell me football hasn't lost its mind. I'm not saying the lad isn't talented. He works hard, he's energetic, and he has plenty of potential.
But when a player with one standout top-flight season is suddenly worth more than some of the greatest midfielders we've seen over the last decade, something has gone seriously wrong.
Look at what has happened to the transfer market. Every window, Manchester City seem to find another reason to raise the price of everyone. £116 million for Elliot Anderson? Massive money for Marc Guéhi. Huge fees for Antoine Semenyo. More than £75 million for Joško Gvardiol. And people wonder why every club keep asking for ridiculous money
This isn't a dig at the players. If a club offers that kind of money, you'd be mad not to take the opportunity. But football has reached a stage where potential is being priced like a Ballon d'Or winner.
Players who are still proving themselves are carrying fees that used to be reserved for the very best in the world.
The problem is bigger than one transfer. When clubs with unlimited resources keep paying these numbers, everyone else follows. Average players become £50 million players, good players become £80 million players, and promising players suddenly cost over £100 million. The market loses all perspective.
Years ago, you paid those fees for footballers who had dominated Europe, won league titles, and delivered season after season. Now, one good campaign and the price tag explodes.
That's not football evolving;that's inflation running wild. If this is where the game is heading, don't be surprised when the first £250 million transfer arrives, because the market has completely lost touch with reality."

I'm all for throwing stones at that lotCjay wrote: ↑Fri Jun 26, 2026 10:31 pm All well and good but the team he made his name at have done as much as anyone to inflate the transfer market by paying huge sums for very little previous record.
Martial, Yoro, Maguire etc.
Players who had done very little Manure paid fortunes for.
So perhaps before throwing stones across the City throw them closer to home first.


Self before self this one
