malcolmw wrote: ↑Sat Oct 21, 2023 11:03 pm
What has Farke not done that he should've and done that he shouldn't, in your eyes?
I think he has used his bench very poorly in the past but did well today.
I think his setup away from home has often been questionable. Our shots against conceded literally doubles, our shots for also drops from 2nd highest to 7th.
Our possession drops from a 62% home average to only just over 50% away (was below 50 before today).
We concede more than twice as many goals away from home which given we clearly concede possession more thus concede more chances is a clear correlation.
Why does he adopt this different setup away from home? I don't know.
He didn't at Norwich, the possession stats home and away both seasons was practically identical.
So this is clearly a conscious decision on his part.
Maybe it's to try and concede fewer chances? It doesn't work.
Maybe its because he had developed a reputation for his teams being defensively iffy so be a bit more Conservative away from home.
Only he can answer that but it hasn't worked for us.
The passive more sit back setup away from home has caused us problems, even first half today.
So that would be my main gripe as that to me is clear tactical plan and that is on Farke.
It's noticeable Maresca and McKenna don't have this wildly different approach home and away, Leicester still average well over 50% possession and largely control games and Ipswich only differ a few percent so the tactics for both of them are familiar and normal.
Indeed Fulham, Burnley, us under Bielsa, Farke himself at Norwich. None of the recent league title winners had the difference in style away vs home that we seem to be using and I really don't understand it.
I get changing the setup in the Premier League against largely better squads, in this league with ours? No I don't.
I'll probably be accused of negativity for this but I think questioning tactical choices is fair right? And you did ask.
But am I happy with the win today, yes of course and I give Farke credit for the subs