Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
Negatives.....
-
Prisoner37
- Subs Bench

- Posts: 992
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:27 pm
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
- A bore draw
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
N. Poor decisions/touches/variation in the final third.
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
Negative: Still struggling away v the low block when we don't get an early goal
- Irish Ian
- Superstar

- Posts: 15713
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 5:53 pm
- Location: Directly above the centre of the Earth.
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
N Not an enjoyable game
"Football is about the people and the players,” he said. “Then there are those who will mingle in the middle: the coaches, executives and journalists. That last group represents the worst part about football" Marcelo Bielsa
- herefordbornleedsboy
- Subs Bench

- Posts: 553
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:42 am
- Location: Hereford
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
Negatives- I waited all weekend to watch that
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
+ Another comfortable clean sheet.
+ Gruev back fully fit.
- No negatives as it was a good performance and a great point.
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
Negative - Poor in the final third of the pitch, poor passes & lost possession far too cheaply.
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
N. Piroe nor Joseph getting us over the line
- Orange Box
- Superstar

- Posts: 5858
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 3:51 pm
- Location: West of Scotland, formerly Cas Vegas
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
NEG. Burnley fans will feel vindicated by their style of play , they got what they wanted
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
N. If there was yet ever another argument for bringing in a No 10 and a striker this game was it. Burnley were there for the taking as they offered very little.
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
Neg - sooooo boring to watch
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
N: Anthony and Roberts not playing for us, perhaps Farke was doing some whispering to them at the end of the game.
Never let good taste stand in the way of style
- CUSSIE01
- Site Contributor

- Posts: 6571
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2023 6:45 am
- Location: Where God finally got it right.
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
Neg - Plenty of the ball but neither the skill nor the nerve to go for the win.
- lufc1304
- Superstar

- Posts: 14095
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:40 pm
- Twitter: @DrGonzo2411
- Location: Lisburn, N.I
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
- Graham Smyth described it as a disgusting game of football and that about sums it up. Fear of losing stripped any excitement from the game.
- Musicman1965
- First Team

- Posts: 1561
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2021 3:11 pm
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
Negative - Farke set up for a draw and got what he wanted - Shows our killer edge is non existent against defensive sides.
-
Tom the Cat
- Reserve Player

- Posts: 418
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2024 8:33 am
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
Negatives - Inability to break down a packed defence - we need someone who can produce the decisive pass.
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
pos - helped me get to sleep
- weasel
- Superstar

- Posts: 17280
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
- Location: Firmly on the Danny-Magnet
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
I think we learnt from our previous away losses whereby we left ourselves open by trying to force the game. We took less risks as ultimately a point against Burnely was better than them going level on points with us.Tom the Cat wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2025 12:10 pm Positives - We got what we went for and have extended our lead at the top.
Negatives - Inability to break down a packed defence - we need someone who can produce the decisive pass.
Re: Positives & Negatives vs Burnley (a)
First side to stop Burnley from having a shot on target this season.... At home as well.
Looked like Farke really tightened up the attack in terms of not leaving too much space when we maraud forwards. Adapted to the situation for the first time in a while.
Defensively solid with a very combative midfield.
Bogle was very good, probably our brightest spark going forwards if a little frustrating with his final ball, improving defensively as well.
Meslier wasn't tested. Squeeky bum time they passed around at the back with him.
Negatives:
I really want him to succeed as I think he's an excellent player in the right system, but Piroe was poor, very little hold up playing ability, passes were overhit and physicality for such a big guy is just not there.... Excellent poacher though..... If only he had the all round game of 26 year old Bamford and his own finishing
Left back is a big issue for me..... Solid enough from Byram but not having a left back with a left foot play on the left is hampering Solomon I feel.
Aarronsson I'm a big fan of his arc from anti hero this year.... Excellent player to have at this level against teams who leave space.... Highlighted we need a Pablo type magician last night to break through an organised defence though.
Think this squad playing farkes tactics would get hammered in prem some weak areas for championship mixed with some prem ready positions in depth. Very little balance.... A striker, 10 and left back would give us the edge in the championship and would give us a platform if we're promoted. I feel its too tight at the moment to say we'll get promoted if teams around us invest in Janand we don't.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: 60sUnited, AcrossThePondAsh, Ahrefs [Bot], airedale, Bing [Bot], BlackHillsPaul, Carrick Dave, Chilli D, Cowboy Dan, Easternwind, Finnatic, Irish Ian, John in Louisiana, Lufc76Cor, Lumiukko, Madron, malcolmw, Pullhard, rj62, Semrush [Bot], SG90, STLWhite, The Subhuman, Tyzy, White Riot, whiteinfrance, whiteswan, Whitleywhite, YorkshireSquare and 375 guests

