If you know you have done bad things in the past that the press might one day find out about what better cover than to pre-emptively start questioning the motives and morals of the press - the. When they come knocking you are just a simple victim.
Seems to basically be an open secret on the comedy circuit that Brand is a wrongun
Fair play to Daniel Sloss
Not suggesting he is as depraved as Saville but many questions need to be asked about people high up in TV companies because if it was an open a secret as Daniel says how has Brand still been employed?
The Times is providing information from 5 female witnesses to C4Dispatches regarding impropriety on the part of Russel Brand the state pressure valve. He's a pied piper of the people that never learn to understand how these privileged ones operate. In Savilles case he hid in plain sight and enjoyed the protection and safety offered by those right at the top, which included MP's in high office, police commissioners, royalty, etc. Jimmy had his accusers like Johnny Rotten and Jill Dando, along with 2 NHS hospitals that barred him from ever returning, but still he continued to operate as a blackmailer to othose who accepted his invitation to one of his parties.
It must be clear to all by now that Saville's crimes were to remain unreported until after his death upon which it then makes shocking headlines. The plan was that dead men take their secrets with them, along with leaving those still alive to sweat it out through total obedience or the ongoing investigation unearths damning evidence.
Brand is a softly spoken comedic celebrity that hasn't been arrested to my knowledge, so don't jump to conclusions just yet. Large cheques speak volumes meaning this story could blow over as quickly as it breaks and it's a common occurrence that wealthy celebrities have the funds to walk free. How much money has the Times paid for the 5 ladies stories and are these details still admissible as evidence. If not, will there be any evidence left for a trial by jury?
If you don't know where you are going, every road will get you nowhere.
Broad Ford wrote: ↑Sun Sep 17, 2023 5:09 pm
The Times is providing information from 5 female witnesses to C4Dispatches regarding impropriety on the part of Russel Brand the state pressure valve. He's a pied piper of the people that never learn to understand how these privileged ones operate. In Savilles case he hid in plain sight and enjoyed the protection and safety offered by those right at the top, which included MP's in high office, police commissioners, royalty, etc. Jimmy had his accusers like Johnny Rotten and Jill Dando, along with 2 NHS hospitals that barred him from ever returning, but still he continued to operate as a blackmailer to othose who accepted his invitation to one of his parties.
It must be clear to all by now that Saville's crimes were to remain unreported until after his death upon which it then makes shocking headlines. The plan was that dead men take their secrets with them, along with leaving those still alive to sweat it out through total obedience or the ongoing investigation unearths damning evidence.
Brand is a softly spoken comedic celebrity that hasn't been arrested to my knowledge, so don't jump to conclusions just yet. Large cheques speak volumes meaning this story could blow over as quickly as it breaks and it's a common occurrence that wealthy celebrities have the funds to walk free. How much money has the Times paid for the 5 ladies stories and are these details still admissible as evidence. If not, will there be any evidence left for a trial by jury?
Innocent until proven guilty but has to he said a lot about Brand is out in public.
Danni Minoque referring to him in an interview as "He is completely crazy and a bit of a vile predator. I certainly don't think he has cured his sex addiction, that's for sure".
His ex wife Katy Perry said she blamed herself for the divorce until she found out the real truth which was something she couldn't necessarily disclose.
While back Katherine Ryan said she called a well known comedian a serial predator to his face whilst they were infronf of a live audience and its an open secret in those circles.
She never named the man for fear of being sued but it was rumoured before all this to be Russell Brand.
Hmm, well as a woman, if invited to spend private time with a film/rock/sports star that I barely knew, I wouldn’t expect us to be discussing economics or playing chess. I have watched a few of Brand’s podcasts, he’s mad as a box of frogs but has a go at some very important people who might feel he needs cancelling. It’s all very unsavoury but he’s never pretended to be anything other than a dirtbag. I’d have run a mile from him but apparently women threw themselves at him. As a certain HRH might say “hold my beer”
Cjay wrote: ↑Sun Sep 17, 2023 6:03 pm
Danni Minoque referring to him in an interview as "He is completely crazy and a bit of a vile predator. I certainly don't think he has cured his sex addiction, that's for sure".
Cures of that nature come with old age. He can do himself a big favour though by staying away from illicit substances he may still be consuming, including alcohol.
Innocent until proven guilty, but then reading the comments above by those who knew him where there's smoke there's fire.
I've found Russell Brand's combination of wealthy socialism an odd mix, appearing to me nothing more than the self serving pied piper of socialist causes.
If you don't know where you are going, every road will get you nowhere.
1964white wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 8:07 am
Brand is an insult to a decent man.
Weirdo!
He might easily feel you're the weirdo Sid, have you had to lead your decent man lifestyle because of your dashing good looks, or because you had to huh ?
How many women have you had to beat off with a stick ? Has that decentman lifestyle been forced upon you by birth ?
Not dependent on Google, the www or 'stats' - Just a guy that puts his eyes to full use on the beautiful game
Always has been an acquired taste and never been my cup of tea. It seems that the more outrageous his behaviour the more he got rewarded by the media and likely the very same media doing a lot of hand wringing and seeking to bring him down.
If what he is being accused is true then there is no excuse or defence IMHO