Players Ratings v Wolves (a)

Predict the scores...if you can!

- LUFC Match Predictions
- Predict Six
- FA Cup Predictions

Plenty to choose from - dip in and have a go - all MOT members welcome. Just for fun.
User avatar
andrewjohnsmith
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 8186
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:58 pm
Location: California (Donny Born-n-Bred)

Re: Players Ratings v Wolves (a)

Post by andrewjohnsmith »

Meslier - 9
Ayling - 6
Koch - 7
Wober - 9
Firpo - 7
Roca - 6
McKennie - 6
Aaronson - 6
Harrison - 9
Bamford - 7
Gnonto - 8

Kristensen - 7
Rodrigo - 7
Summerville - 6
Struijk - 6
geeno_philly
Ballboy
Ballboy
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2022 12:47 pm

Re: Players Ratings v Wolves (a)

Post by geeno_philly »

Only saw first half.

Meslier - 9
Ayling - 5.....like his spirit...but hes not a right back at this level IMO.
Koch - 7
Wober - 9
Firpo - 6.5
Roca - 6
McKennie - 5.5....looked slow back tracking on several plays. Said to my kid he looked "thick"
Aaronson - 6
Harrison - 7.5
Bamford - 7
Gnonto - 8

No Subs...(didnt see 2nd half)..Again..these are first 1/2 ratings IMO.
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 129352
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Players Ratings v Wolves (a)

Post by 1964white »

8.5 Meslier
7 Ayling
9 Koch
9 Wober
6 Firpo
6 Roca
6 McKennie
5 Aaronson
9 Harrison
7 Bamford
8.5 Gnonto

7 Kristensen
6 Rodrigo
7 Summerville
6 Struijk
User avatar
Byebyegeegee
First Team
First Team
Posts: 2391
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2020 5:14 pm
Location: God’s own county (north)

Re: Players Ratings v Wolves (a)

Post by Byebyegeegee »

faaip wrote: Sun Mar 19, 2023 11:48 am Apologies, for some reason I must have edited out the BBC game day ratings part out of my post....for it was those that I was refering to, we had 6 or 7 8 pluses, worst was 7.5 or something. Wolves got mostly 4's with a few 3's. Their best was around 4.5

As for the final bit, my votes cannot be influenced by the result as they're kept during the game and I've had players getting 9's in a losing effort many times

I start from 6

6 - The baseline for a match of doing nothing wrong and nothing good, just for being on the pitch really. So a score of seven is just above average


from there I add for good, (1-2 points for a goal, .5 -1.5 for an assist, .5 for a clever pass, good tackle, interception, shot on goal, good run/movement etc)
I subtract for yellows, reds, losing possession, very poor pass, missing tackles, pulling out of blocks, not making a run, wtf moments etc, etc, etc

I think IIRC Harrison's score went up or down 9 times in game ending with an 8. No recency bias, no forgetting they started a game well.... no influence from the final score...
Ok faaip fair enough. My game ratings are based on my overall impression of a player throughout the game not necessarily formulated by specific incidents, although a goal or an assist or a goal saving tackle or something exceptional would be taken into account. I suppose the result is an influence too but I know that you can play well and lose undeservedly and, of course, vice versa.
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 129352
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Players Ratings v Wolves (a)

Post by 1964white »


:gold: Wober
:silver: = Harrison
:silver: = Meslier
Post Reply