Pascal Struijk

For everything Leeds United related and everything not - Have your say... the Marching on Together way!
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.

Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
User avatar
andrewjohnsmith
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 6547
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:58 pm
Location: California (Donny Born-n-Bred)

Re: Pascal Struijk - We need Wober back quick.

Post by andrewjohnsmith »

faaip wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 6:15 pm Both full backs struggling it seems with this need to move them to be a CB 3 when we lose possession. Leaves a lot of space down the wings. So not only do we not play with width we also ignore width defensively. If JM could shave off an extra 10 yards of ER's width I'm sure he would. IIRC we play to the narrow limit atm
I had a hard time summing up Rasmus yesterday. He made some killer final blocks, recovering well several times. But he also seemed way out of position several times. Seems more and more like that "out of position" is intentional.
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 52501
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by The Subhuman »

andrewjohnsmith wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 7:28 pm I had a hard time summing up Rasmus yesterday. He made some killer final blocks, recovering well several times. But he also seemed way out of position several times. Seems more and more like that "out of position" is intentional.
It is, we don't seem to be playing the way we did v Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal. Even Spurs. All four of those games we looked good versus top 6 sides. I'm wondering if the negative shift of tactics is for the lesser teams we struggle against... I guess we'll see
"Never debate an idiot, they'll only drag you down to their level and they have the advantage of experience"
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 123857
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by 1964white »

Apart from Meslier, our two full-backs were our best players.

Go on, give me a laugh, who played better than those three?
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 26660
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by Cjay »

1964white wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 8:25 pm Apart from Meslier, our two full-backs were our best players.

Go on, give me a laugh, who played better than those three?
Gnonto after Meslier
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 26660
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by Cjay »

faaip wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 7:07 pm You can assign some blame for overly complicating the system which will lead to mistakes. We've recently changed formation and we also now change formation in game. That takes getting used to. Players are expected to be robots, why not the manager?
A manager can do so much, tactics etc and blame will always be attributed and rightly so.

But when a player is on a pitch they need to be brave enough to make there own decisions as the match unfolds.

The best ever didn't get where they are by being robots.

They adapted in game when situations developed that required it.

That is what Struijk should have done.

No fan of Marsch and his tactics but players need to be brave and good enough to recognise danger as it develops and snuff it out.

He was far to narrow and Mahrez took advantage.
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
weasel
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 13057
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
Location: Within a mile of Yorkshire

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by weasel »

Cjay wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 7:03 pm I don't think it's fair to blame Marsch for every mistake.

They are humans not robots.

You have a man, you make sure you are close enough to mark him if needed.
I think you can blame a manager if his system/formation makes it impossible for a player to be in the position he should be. It is fair to praise the manager if RK or PS gets an assist or a goal because the system/formation allows them to get forward but equally it is then the manager's fault if the player can't get back (unless the player is too lazy).
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 123857
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by 1964white »

Cjay wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 8:43 pm Gnonto after Meslier
Our only real spark going forward, but Kristensen & Struijk had much more to contend with as we were defending for much of the game.

Watch the game again & you'll see how much work they got through.

Shame our CB's or Roca & Forshaw didn't put in a similar shift.
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 26660
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by Cjay »

weasel wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:09 pm I think you can blame a manager if his system/formation makes it impossible for a player to be in the position he should be. It is fair to praise the manager if RK or PS gets an assist or a goal because the system/formation allows them to get forward but equally it is then the manager's fault if the player can't get back (unless the player is too lazy).
He was running back concentrating on Haaland in front of him and had his back to Mahrez who he left in acres of space.

Not long before that he had gone after De Bruyne getting nowhere near him and it lead to a chance for Grealish that he should have scored.

Seems to be a desire to blame Marsch for every error.

That for me is a player not doing the basics.

If you charge out if position you better be sure you get the ball, Struijk didn't especially 1st half more than once and we got exposed down the left often (hence why Grealish had so many chances he missed).

Struijk as a natural cb (he isn't a left back and it's obvious) will naturally come inside.

Nothing to do with tactics, his natural instinct for a position he has played his whole career will mean he is often attracted inside.

I read an interview with Maldini once and he said very much this, its why you rarely get players able to play cb and full back and the vast majority of full backs were players who weren't good enough for other roles.

Usually wingers or centre backs.

The natural instinct of a cb is totally different to the natural instinct of a full back.
Last edited by Cjay on Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:23 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 26660
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by Cjay »

1964white wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:17 pm Our only real spark going forward, but Kristensen & Struijk had much more to contend with as we were defending for much of the game.

Watch the game again & you'll see how much work they got through.

Shame our CB's or Roca & Forshaw didn't put in a similar shift.
I agree on Kristensen first half.

Don't think Struijk was that good myself.
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 52501
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by The Subhuman »

Cjay wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 8:46 pm A manager can do so much, tactics etc and blame will always be attributed and rightly so.

But when a player is on a pitch they need to be brave enough to make there own decisions as the match unfolds.

The best ever didn't get where they are by being robots.

They adapted in game when situations developed that required it.

That is what Struijk should have done.

No fan of Marsch and his tactics but players need to be brave and good enough to recognise danger as it develops and snuff it out.

He was far to narrow and Mahrez took advantage.
That narrowness is what Marsch is looking for, the third goal the same.

It always starts and finishes with the manager... he sets the team up, the tactics, the formation, the substitutions, the coaching and the training.... There can be extenuating circumstances and I think we'll be a much better squad when Sinisterra and Bamford return but that's really his only issue at the moment... Most teams if you take one player out they'll not be the same team. Liverpool losing Van Dijk for the season sent the Champions into a tail spin most of the next comparatively. City should win the CL and Premiership, long term injury to Haaland and one of those maybe both are threatened
"Never debate an idiot, they'll only drag you down to their level and they have the advantage of experience"
User avatar
weasel
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 13057
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
Location: Within a mile of Yorkshire

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by weasel »

Cjay wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:18 pm Seems to be a desire to blame Marsch for every error.
I don't think Marsch is to blame:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-s ... e-64116986
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 123857
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by 1964white »

Arsenal

Good
2 defensive headers
1 defensive clearance
1 block
1 pass

Bad
1 lost his marker
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 123857
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by 1964white »

Forest

Good
6 interceptions
5 defensive headers
4 defensive clearances
3 blocks
3 tackles
3 passes
1 pass
high % pass accuracy

Bad

Rating - 9.5 Pascal back to his very best in his favoured position
User avatar
andrewjohnsmith
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 6547
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:58 pm
Location: California (Donny Born-n-Bred)

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by andrewjohnsmith »

1964white wrote: Thu Apr 06, 2023 6:31 pm Forest

Good
6 interceptions
5 defensive headers
4 defensive clearances
3 blocks
3 tackles
3 passes
1 pass
high % pass accuracy

Bad

Rating - 9.5 Pascal back to his very best in his favoured position
Pascal made some monumental contributions in the game. And he was calm and organized throughout. We always knew we had a gem. Just needed a decent manager with a decent game plan.
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 123857
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by 1964white »

andrewjohnsmith wrote: Thu Apr 06, 2023 7:12 pm Pascal made some monumental contributions in the game. And he was calm and organized throughout. We always knew we had a gem. Just needed a decent manager with a decent game plan.
So many improved individual performances, playing as a team under the guidance of Javi.

3 victories in his 6 games, what a difference to Marsch's record of 3 wins in 16 games.
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 123857
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by 1964white »

Palace

Good
3 interceptions
3 defensive clearances
2 defensive headers
3 interceptions
3 tackles
2 passes
1 header on target
1 block

Bad
3 dribbled past
3 lost his marker
1 failed to stop or get near the Olise's cross for Ayew headed goal
1 lost the ball over the top that led to another Palace chance.

7 errors in the second-half
User avatar
andrewjohnsmith
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 6547
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:58 pm
Location: California (Donny Born-n-Bred)

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by andrewjohnsmith »

1964white wrote: Mon Apr 10, 2023 7:48 pm Palace

Good
3 interceptions
3 defensive clearances
2 defensive headers
3 interceptions
3 tackles
2 passes
1 header on target
1 block

Bad
3 dribbled past
3 lost his marker
1 failed to stop or get near the Olise's cross for Ayew headed goal
1 lost the ball over the top that led to another Palace chance.

7 errors in the second-half
Pascal often gets lost in poor performances. He's not the man to stand up to an onslaught. He's a talented player but he's not a leader. He seems very introverted and lacks authority. Unfortunately, Koch is exactly the same way. They worked together against Forest because Forest were poor. But we really lack a leader at the back. Someone that organize and snap everyone else back into shape.
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 123857
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Pascal Struijk - We need Wober back quickly

Post by 1964white »

Pascal's head is in the clouds at times. I have serious concerns about him.
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 123857
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by 1964white »

West Ham

Good
3 tackles
2 blocks
2 interceptions
2 defensive clearances
1 defensive header
1 pass

Bad
3 lost his marker
2 lost possession
1 dribbled past
1 poor pass
1 poor cross

Like so many, easy to play against

5/10
User avatar
JoeDenver
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 1076
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:58 pm

Re: Pascal Struijk

Post by JoeDenver »

1964white wrote: Tue May 23, 2023 9:43 pm West Ham

Good
3 tackles
2 blocks
2 interceptions
2 defensive clearances
1 defensive header
1 pass

Bad
3 lost his marker
2 lost possession
1 dribbled past
1 poor pass
1 poor cross

Like so many, easy to play against

5/10
Thanks Leon, confirmed my suspicions…he isn’t ideal anywhere on the pitch. I somehow think he’d be a decent Serie B center half for Sampdoria if Radz were to acquire them.
Fly Fishing, Skiing, and The Damned United
Post Reply