I should think so.
Been a big supporter of Bamford all year for all the things he does besides scoring goals; defending set pieces, his hold up play, etc. And for all his problems he is 8th in the league in goals scored. Of course, he's managed that while putting only 43% of his shots on target, the lowest percentage of any of the league's top scorers.
Bamford, for me, was preferable to Eddie precisely because of all those other things he does that Eddie didn't do nearly as well. And while Bamford might not be the most clinical striker out there, we are still third in the league in goals scored this year, so we are getting production from our offense; those "other things" that Bamford does are a big part of that productivity.
If, however, we can get someone who does all those other things while also managing to get 50% or 60% of his shots on target, then we should acquire that player as you should never miss an opportunity to improve your side. If Adams is that man, then we should grab him.