The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Mon 23 July)

For everything Leeds United related and everything not - Have your say... the Marching on Together way!
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.

Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
User avatar
Richard
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
Posts: 543
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:50 am
Twitter: @northantsmanvan
Location: Northampton
Contact:

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Mon 23 July)

Post by Richard »

Basically we sell Wood for an extortionate amount, instead of reinvesting it in a decent replacement striker Orta signs up several below average squad players who are now surplus to requirements on long contracts and we have no money left.
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 127717
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Mon 23 July)

Post by 1964white »

Gandalf wrote: Mon Jul 23, 2018 1:29 pm I didn't post that ??
Who posted this then, I'm confused ?

I don't believe there was an actual offer, otherwise he would have been out of the door. Fed up of seeing him fall over at the slightest puff of wind. A more robust and skilful target man needed.
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 127717
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Mon 23 July)

Post by 1964white »

Richard wrote: Mon Jul 23, 2018 2:41 pm Basically we sell Wood for an extortionate amount, instead of reinvesting it in a decent replacement striker Orta signs up several below average squad players who are now surplus to requirements on long contracts and we have no money left.
And Taylor too !
User avatar
Gandalf
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11611
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:51 am

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Mon 23 July)

Post by Gandalf »

1964white wrote: Mon Jul 23, 2018 3:30 pm Who posted this then, I'm confused ?

I don't believe there was an actual offer, otherwise he would have been out of the door. Fed up of seeing him fall over at the slightest puff of wind. A more robust and skilful target man needed.
Yes I posted that, but I didn't post what was, obviously, your response, but was in my name.
Delapsus Resurgam - When I fall I shall rise!
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 127717
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Mon 23 July)

Post by 1964white »

Gandalf wrote: Mon Jul 23, 2018 6:14 pm Yes I posted that, but I didn't post what was, obviously, your response, but was in my name.
But we do agree on the subject of Roofe
User avatar
Ellandback1
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 8777
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Mon 23 July)

Post by Ellandback1 »

Leeds United have apologised and promised to refund supporters following problems with the streaming of pre-season friendlies on the club’s online television station, LUTV.
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 28191
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Mon 23 July)

Post by Cjay »

Media Mogul owner hoovering up broadcasting deals all over the place.

Charges for crappy friendlies.

Has to cancel streaming because the system is poo.

You have to laugh :lol:
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 55508
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Mon 23 July)

Post by The Subhuman »

Yes the friendlies should have been free. PR error. Now go contact Game Pass to see how it should be done Rads
"Never debate an idiot, they'll only drag you down to their level and they have the advantage of experience"
Post Reply