See, I kind of get why people were for Cellino at the time, because I guess it was better to take a gamble than face administration. I don't think Cellino, the consortium or indeed any other person out there would have the know-how to 'fix Leeds' within a relatively short time, 6-12 months. What Cellino does provide is the money to help keep the club afloat while the problems are eliminated by trial and error and the ruthlessness (or not give-a-s**t attitude) that is needed to change things.Armleywhite wrote:Somebody asked me why I was surprised. Well, TBH, m not. Jus bloody angry that the club is once again in the hands of a total schyster. Again, this also doesn't surprise means as modern football is all about such things. However, I have voiced my concern about Cellino since he made inroads to buying the club and asked why such a crook appeared to be welcomed. I was shot down by some for saying that the consortium were, for me, a far better option. well, it seems the people got what the people wanted. like I said previously, frying pan and fire spring to mind.
That being said I don't see how people can defend his time here. His drunken rants, his abysmal treatment of players and manager, his ridiculous demands...the list goes on. And now he's hiring Hockaday? I'm all for giving lower league talent a shot but to tell the fans you are going to spend money and gain promotion in 2 years and to then back it up with a Lidl quality manager... that's beyond defensible.
Nevertheless, I'll give Hockaday some time. Compare and contrast our recent managers (Grayson, Warnock, McDermott) and you'll see it was the one who had the least renowned CV performed the best. The same applies for players (ranging from Hunt, Kebe, and Morrison to Beckford, Snodgrass and Becchio). I'll always give people time and get behind them. Cellinos time, however, has been ticking for months now and his rep is only going one way.